
Image : http://www.flickr.com
6th January 2008 was devoted to the New York Times Book Review on "Islam" as the heading for the exit boldly proclaimed. The requirement is that some of the most important historical, literary, political and theological inform contemporary discourse on Islam around the mark, as found in modern literature. The attempt to shed light on an important subject that is commendable. The following are my comments on the articles and essays. Followorder in the review. 1. This edition of the excellent book review essay on Tariq Ramadan begins with the reading of the Koran. Ramadan is able to cover in a short essay, is the simplicity and complexity of the nuances of the Koran) (Koran. Its simplicity is its ability to deal individually rooted believing heart. At this level, the Quran is simple and accessible to all. Every man is in his message, through the prism of his personal experiences, filteredKnowledge, joy, pain, triumphs and defeats, their intimacy. At this level, the message "is not a mediator." This is the basis of what relates to Ramadan is the dialogue between the Qur'an and its readers. Ramadan starts well, that the spirit of dialogue.
However, the Quran is unclear and its message can be quite complex at a different level, one seeks a detailed understanding of the complex legal implications, social and moral message.Is the challenge of Ramadan tells us is "to regulate Islamic law, questions of faith, religious practice derived, and their basic requirements." Here literalism and dogma do not take much, although much of the current controversy surrounding the debates about the messages in the pontification of the Qur'an Muslims and non Muslims to inform.
Ramadan As mentioned, this is an area that requires special methodological tools Koranic scholars.These are the tools that allow the productive application of reason to divine text. That such an application can be shown during the long history of Islam, and began to read the rich and that we have inherited from the Great Qur'an exegetes. These methodological tools that have a thorough knowledge of literature and language of Arabic grammar, rhetoric, logic, knowledge of Mecca and Medinan verses (signs) of the Koran and other sciences, Ramadan is notto be mentioned.
The possession of these instruments is vital completed by the possession of a final, that does not explain Ramadan to a deep spirituality that creates an inseparable union between the heart and soul. And 'this merger, which really opens the door to a true and deep understanding of the information contained in the Koran. In the words of Ramadan, "The reason is the book and read it, but does so in the company of the heart, of spirituality."
In our time the need for a deeperReading the Koran, was never perhaps more to the great difference between the Company, the witnesses of the original disclosure of the text and the time in which we live has never been greater. Therefore, there is great need for harmonization between the text and our context that harmonization is impossible until there is a profound harmony between the heart and mind. Ramadan makes this point emphatically. If we Muslims are able to make a reconciliation between ourThe heart, often times through the bright, sometimes obscures the light of the modern state of blind and mind are perhaps the most often stunned by the seductive illusion of certainty, then we will be able to contribute to reconciliation between not only the text of Entry into force of the Koran and the context, we seek to sustain its leadership in the application, but also between different individuals compete for priority, or simply trying to survive in an increasingly interdependent world.
2. Irshad Manji's Reviewby John Kelsey with the topic of just war in Islam is plagued by two trends that characterize his work, namely, a strong ideological orientation and lack of deep understanding of Islamic law, exegesis and methods. Both of these trends are working together to undermine the seriousness of their scholarship and accuracy of their conclusions.
An example of the former is illustrated by his comment on the statement Kelsay civilians in the light of classical Islamic legal reasoningDeaths may be warranted "if the enemy's military resources are used among the civilian population. … Soldiers whose actions place in such conditions are excused from guilt associated with unjust killing." Manji said: "This ruling would let Israeli Defense Forces the hook for damages in their 2006 war in Lebanon, since Hezbollah deliberately operated in residential Beirut." Manji defense of the IDF, would be more credible, but no more acceptable whenthe destruction by the Israeli army during the war was the slums of southern Beirut, is limited. However, you slightly the killing of hundreds of Lebanese civilians in areas where there is no excuse presence of Hezbollah, the wanton destruction of Lebanese civilian infrastructure and the introduction of hundreds of thousands of cluster bombs and land on the fields of Lebanon cultivated. If these are too easily dismissed as forms of collateral damage, that Muslims have no moral authority or theologicaldemand, because a gap in the classical Islamic strategic thinking?
That trend is supported by her concluding remarks on the verse from the Koran that "the faithful saying that killing an innocent person is like killing all humanity, as has been done to punish the evil presented." Continues the mention of the term "reformist Muslims" do not interpret this verse comes to the conclusion that might be the kind of reinterpretation, "and the next chapter in the recaptureShariah reasoning and the richness of Islam itself. "For the reform of Islamic legal thought in order to reduce the reinterpretation of a single verse, especially the question one, is a very untenable assertion.
Although the work Kelsay is probably quite revealing, is a genre of writing on Islam characteristic that is very problematic. This literature is to explain the evolution in the Islamic world easily sensationalized cultural variables that pale faceThe strength of analysis of those other more nuanced. In this case, the cultural variable is religion. Manji cites Kelsay with the words: "Those who say that Islam has nothing to do with the attacks of 9 / 11, or the tactics of Iraqi" insurgents "is no comfort to be found here …"
The implicit assumption behind this statement is that if we are to understand Islam, especially its legal justification, then you can do because it is formed 9 / 11, or to understand why the Iraqi insurgents choose the tactics that they do.I want to say that the Islamic legal reasoning has little to do with not understanding. If suicide terrorism is the problem of being so declared that Islam would give us a little view into what motivates the Tamil Tigers since the completion, the prototype and suicide probably the most successful terrorist campaign in the history of the date. If car-bomb tactics to be, then declared that Islam would do little to explain the ruthless campaign of the Zionist Stern Gang in Palestine in 1940, orhighly effective campaign by the Viet Cong and their supporters in the American campaign in Vietnam in 1960. What is informed of Islam, the tactics of radical Islamic contemporaries, these methods in a way that is fundamentally different from the above two different groups to work in? Robert Pape, as demonstrated in the case of suicide bombings, would be much more productive than other variables taken into account.
If someone believes that the application of "pre-modern past," continues toexplain the violence in the contemporary Muslim world on globalization, foreign occupation, and economic marginalization, lack of education and a host of other factors, so the misunderstanding only provide information, strategies to address the current crisis wrong will also help perpetuate the kind of ignorance that gives public support for this policy.
And 'interesting, do not select the Book Review, a publication to mark, which deals with the nature ofI quote the above explanations. Pape, Dying to Win, Michael Scheuer's Imperial Hubris, and Olivier Roy Globalized Islam are examples of works that have been mentioned in this context. This is not to argue that the thesis Kelsay has no validity. However, its true meaning is very questionable.
3. Jeffrey Goldberg, "Seeds of Hate, is a revision of Matthias Kuntzel is Jihad and Jew-hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the roots of 9 / 11. Goldberg echoes, there is the ill-packaged KuntzelNonsense that is based on the Jew-hatred in the Muslim world, as well as "scandalously ubiquitous. The Islamic world is very expansive, and it would be an effort of imagination to think that the kind of anti-Jewish hatred that is in pamphlets littering some of the libraries in the heart of Islam prevalent in Arab Muslim countries such as West Africa, Muslim populations in Central Asia and in the southern Philippines. Goldberg acknowledges that we are not talking about aMember ubiquitous and more at the end of his article, "Still Kuntzel is true that we have a terrible explosion of anti-Jewish hatred in the Middle East to live …"
The debatable nature of the claims K?ntzel indicating the nature of the grant will support the location of his assertion made (in words Goldberg), two Muslim leaders in particular, voluntarily and knowingly Nazi ideology directly to the Muslim masses. "These two leadersPalestinians, Amin al-Husseini, and the founder of the Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood, Hasan al-Banna. Throughout his life, not to mention, much less today, it would be difficult, a Muslim outside of Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which can also be found one of Amin al-Husseini al. Although Hasan al-Banna's ideas would have an indirect influence on the programs of several Islamic organizations, which was the Jamaati Islami of India and Pakistan that have an effect largely confined to a fewCountries outside the heart of Arab Islam, and not by extending the western educated elites who formed the backbone of these movements. The masses in these countries, more and more traditional types of Islamic organizations, such as the Sufi brotherhoods in the Annex.
Where is the role of Hasan al-Banna in the transmission of these hateful ideas of his place of birth of the European Muslim world Kuntzel too much weight on a yet to be resurgence of Islam. The role of the ArabNationalism and nationalist thinkers as Sati-Husri during the 1930 and 1940 in this transfer is much more important. Those were the heady days of revolution and Arab nationalist thinkers like al-nationalist Husri, Michel Aflaq and others saw a lot more to learn from the techniques of mass mobilization, such as the manipulation of national symbols, and the racist propaganda of Mussolini and Hitler, Muslim figures like al-Banna had ever done.
K?ntzel the use of the word"Jihad" in its title is also important. The juxtaposition of "jihad" and "Jew-hatred to conclude" that seems somehow a little anti-Semitism, on the grounds of the actions of the 21 Century, has to do jihadists. That link would be very difficult to prove. Most analysts of the contemporary jihadi movement known almost total abandonment of both bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, have given the Palestinian question. When indicated by them or their cohorts, it is usually done in a languageevidence of alibi. Why then use this language? I would say that this raises a very emotional way to mask the real problems of some Muslims to violence.
The same could be said, with the inclusion of the phrase "… and the roots of 9 / 11" in the subtitle. Even those who are hopelessly inadequate official story these days almost never mention the hatred of Jews to accept that one of the factors that led to the execution of the attacks involved. Again, it is remarkable thatK?ntzel would be such a link.
K?ntzel has a real problem. However, he seems to be too simplistic in its analysis of the causes and impact of their solution. To his credit, Goldberg points out, this simplification. As he says, see the "excess" and cruelty "of Israel as a factor in the emergence of a virulent hatred of Jews in some parts of the Muslim world. This does not mean to apologize. However, it is certainly a factor to explain.
4. Fouad Ajami'sEssay on Sam Huntington's Clash of Civilization thesis is his realization that Huntington was right all along. Must maintain the events of 9 / 11 to Ajami to do the light. As Ajami says, "The 19 young Arabs who struck America on 9 / 11 were to give Huntington more of history than he had ever imagined." He also notes that the radicals and their ilk "had overwhelmed the order of their homeland …"
All this seems strange. As far as I canto see that business as usual in all authoritarian Muslim countries that have experienced the threat of radical Islam. Egypt dutifully crushed Ayman Zawahiri and his followers, forcing them to take refuge in the caves of Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia has survived the challenge from Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, without even a minor disturbance to the flow of oil. Even in Pakistan, a country where young Muslim radicals, because they are considered more dangerous than being overwhelmed by President Musharraf, along withMilitary and feudal elites because it serves as a front are firmly in command. No informed observer would believe otherwise. Musharraf has been sent by various Islamic groups to give the impression of an exaggerated the Islamist threat to its Western backers, and, of course, is the only one who has to deal with that threat.
In more secular Muslim country, Tunisia, the Islamic movement and its leaders in exile defeat, Rashid al-Ghanoush, show signs ofof a return. Even in Turkey, where Ajami puts excessive emphasis on the Islamic roots of the party currently in power is clear that you have the politicians, regardless of its origin Islamist line of towing and the army was forced to engage in many painful compromises in order that prevent the direct intervention of the military avowedly secular political arena. In the Muslim republics of Central Asia to prevent the emergence of yet brutal repression of a peaceful IslamMovement.
Ajami effort to give credence to Huntington's thesis leads to an incredible lack of analytical depth. It leads, for example, the fact that the percentage of population in the world under direct political control of the West from 40 percent in 1900 to 15 percent in 1990 decreased, while the share of Islam from 4 percent in 1900-13 percent increase in 1990. Even if we reject the fact that most of the growth in the Islamic empire to a disproportionately high can be attributedPopulation growth is Ajami said the failure of the type of neo-colonization to be collected. The premise of the new settlement is that it requires more costly and politically damaging direct control. The details of the operation of the new relations of domination and control are well known, and their impact on the development of the world is well documented.
Ajami analysis also ignores the economic realities of the world system. If we look at the economic dominance offormer colonial powers, we would surely find that the forms of economic dependence in former colonies and wealth-sharing pattern between them and their former vassals are even worse. The kind of globalization has made all parts of the population in many developing structurally unemployed or employed, even in countries like India, where a handful of people who received the services of IT outsourcing.
To ignore his case may Ajamiother important developments, such as West orchestrated Pervasive globalization is equally difficult in the Muslim world, as elsewhere. The young Arabs and Muslims Ajami sees the troops as "shock of a new radicalism," wear blue jeans, blazer and communication through mobile phones and the Internet. Their frustration in many cases, is bred by a lack of control have on their life chances because of the volatility of the global economy.
9 / 11, despiteHuntington's clash of civilization is the story wrong and is bad social science. From a historical point of view, it would be difficult to argue that Islam and Christianity are two different cultures. Both stem from common roots and are protected by the dynamism that the peoples of the Mediterranean into an integrated system, although often contradictory forged as a whole are integrated. The food, language, customs and social mores of a Palestinian Christians differ in the shape of a small PalestinianMuslim. To put the religion that alone generates in some way different cultures, civilizations through art no less determined, is not a good proposal. If any European Christians are clearly out of their Latin American or Middle Eastern brethren, that Huntington suggests, it is expected that these differences have nothing to do with religion.
The Clash of Civilizations thesis on, do not bear that many conclusions based on facts. Argues, for example, Huntington's, whichspeak with a common mitigation of conflicts of civilizations. But the two world wars, fought primarily between Christians in Europe were the bloodiest conflicts and most expensive in history. More recently, in the Muslim world, the Iran-Iraq war, which raged 1980-1988, what was the death of over a million troops, the bloodiest war in history in the region, despite the fact that both parties were Muslims. A common "culture" was not a mitigating factor inthese fires.
Addition, the clean lines of Huntington's guilt is not based clearly on the ground. It was the Gulf War of 1991, an example of a clash of civilizations? To destroy the American Christian and British, along with Saudi and Kuwaiti Muslim Muslims in Iraq. As we consider the fault lines in relation to this conflict?
Ajami admits reluctantly: "I still harbor doubts about whether the radical Islamists knocking at our doors, or attacked from within, areSupport a civilization. "I can assure you that Mr. Ajami did not even beat the holders of a partial civilization. As Olivier Roy points out, are the sons of globalization. Difference of the Turks, when they besieged Vienna twice, are at the gates of Europe, and if some countries Europeans, a visa granted to them can be obtained, if not in the vicinity of the property.
5. Reviewed by William Dalrymple Ghalib Lakhnawi and Abdullah Bilgrami Adventures of Amir Hamzais a welcome addition to the Book Review Collection. This work goes far beyond humanize speeches or any number of educational initiatives in the Muslim world. With so much attention on the bloody things, the guide is given front page coverage by western media on the Muslim world, it is refreshing to read a great work of literature data. Dalrymple concise overview of the evolution of this kind of writing is clear and understandable.
Its revision is alsosad, because he points out, this form of art, along with almost all the classical Islamic art, with the notable exception of the calligraphy is almost dead. In this context, questions of Dalrymple subtle challenge to Muslims, saying: "If the Sackler's" Hamzanama "exhibition was the first time a Western audience was exposed to the history of Hamza, and also served as a wake-up call in Urdu and Persian scholars. It became apparent that this epic, said to be the longest singleDocument Romance in the world, is almost forgotten. "The alarm Dalrymple said, extends far beyond learned Persian and Urdu. And 'what should be respected by all Muslims.
As a viable and competitive in the nation includes much more than the ability to produce doctors and engineers, professions primaries, the majority of Muslim parents for their children directly. Without an adequate and dedicated researchers in the humanities and social sciences, it is difficult to see how the nature ofIslamic world in the pages of stories Hamza is expressed to be resumed. This world is a world rooted in reality, which are characterized by real people engage the world in human terms. This is a world capable of producing great works of art and literature, a world of subtleties and nuances, a world of heroes and heroines.
A revival of Islamic civilization does not need a return to the era of prophetic, do not even have to start from scratch in the face of new risksthe modern and now post-modern conditions. This is a profound knowledge of tradition to demand comes from the struggle of Muslims who are subject to our religion in the world so much as it will be a rededication of our religion that has guided skiing, which require commitment. It will also require the creative imagination of so many heads that produce undesirable brings together over many centuries, The Adventures of Amir Hamza, as well as the creative genius of assimilation shownproduces the distinctive character of Mughal art in Hamzanama displayed.
It 'interesting that Dalrymle indicates that begins with The Adventures of Amir Hamza, near Baghdad, and takes place in an area that includes most of the Middle East has become synonymous with conflict and struggles. The falsification of a new day in the region will depend largely on how we in the West imagine. I hope it works as The Adventures of Amir Hamza will help the region and its wonderful people in a viewmore people to light.
6. Beyond the burqa, Lorraine Adams essay on the condition of Muslim women in Western literature is a call for the inclusion of a wider range of voices in the literature on Muslim women currently in the West. Adams points to the highly politicized, what is the nature of translated and published, and, therefore, effectively on the market. She cites the case of infidels Hirsi Ali memories. Work Ali, whose veracity doubt mobilize allstereotyping that comes with the nature of Islam by radical Islamists, the enemy of choice is represented today assigned a best-selling book and its author is suitable for a scholarship at the American Enterprise Institute.
Adams then goes on to mention the likes of Nawal El Saadawi, Egyptian feminist scholar and activist of long standing whose scholarship, integrity and career achievements, the Dwarves of Hirsi Ali, but the ambivalence of the imperial project American banditthose works which were translated into English in order to obscure the shelves of British bookshops back.
Adams also shows the power of a brief review of the work of exiled Iranian model of Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran. The success of this work to a whole series of similar works carried out by Iranian women. Together we can work on the stereotypical view of most Americans have strengthened the Islamic Republic, but very little to the understanding of the Addcomplex, highly differentiated Iranian social and political systems. It denies even unconsciously telling space for other voices of Iranian women, the different types of stories. This is a dangerous trend, because the American public will probably soon be called upon to accept a form of military action against Iran. In the absence of understanding, the blood is, unfortunately, a very strong.
Perhaps the biggest problem of the essay by Adam, one who almost universalIf Western women write Muslim societies, their inability to work of women who were easily identifiable, and proudly describe themselves as practicing Muslims. He confirmed that "moderate Muslims practicing, but tolerant and radical fundamentalists …" . There But his review of the literature, are produced by women in the Muslim world, no evidence of the literary production of this page. It would certainly be enlightening and inspiring to see whatI took the driving factors of women in the stands, they have, and what is their point of view of social reality, some consider it so insidious and demeaning their sex.
This is a challenge for the practice of Muslim women in the West, many of which are in English and a major Muslim languages fluently. Be known by the original works to be translated and leave your stories and the stories of your sisters. It is only through the telling of these stories, the wealthCome complexity and richness of the Islamic world will be known. Only then can we begin to realize the vision of Dedi Felman, Adams was quoted as saying: "We ask the people that others are not what they want or expect to recognize, but what is the concept." After everything has been said and done such an attitude is absolutely vital for mutual understanding.
End of Part OneOne
http://www.newislamicdirections.com/nid/articles/review_of_islam_in_nyt_book_review/
For more information:
Phone: 510.387.2604 / 1.866.496.8598
Fax: 510.251.0993